Al Gore Introduces Info Superhighway later referred to as the Web (2)
Inventor Dorothy M. Hartman shares extra in regards to the secretive trial the place she alleges her data is shared with the {industry} however not shared with the general public.
— Dorothy M. Hartman
PHILADELPHIA , PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES , June 9, 2022 /EINPresswire.com/ — She alleges that it’s only a solution to discover out what she says and share with the “web gang” that then adjustments its historical past accordingly.
How did these folks go from being peculiar residents to politicians to millionaires and billionaires in a matter of years ?
“Now I higher perceive why they’re finishing up a secretive , disguise -from -the -public court docket case . Nothing within the court docket data has any fact to it”, alleges Inventor . To start with no reply has been given by the federal government in any respect as to to the inventor’s criticism listed at Doc # 1 . They might have entered one thing , even when to say “ridiculous” however they haven’t . The truth that it’s secretive however involving one of many main Nationwide Courts within the nation is suspect in itself . Are the inventor’s claims appropriate ? You’d suppose so from the best way issues are being dealt with . Though the Court docket has not entered a solution from the federal government to the inventor’s criticism, the Court docket has taken Ms. Hartman’s motions which might be all listed by the court docket in some type of ERROR , both Clerical or Administrative . None of Ms. Hartman’s motions have been entered wholly or with out error . Regardless of that reality , the Court docket proceeded to file a Judgment on Could 18 , 2022 dismissing the case . That is one other dangerous judgment in a collection of dangerous judgments .
The knowledge shared with the court docket to help her allegations that her mental property was stolen seems to be shared amongst the telecom firms and the federal government companies which might be addressed in her complaints however the public by no means sees any of it. Her transmissions to the court docket are simply interrupted , considered and captured by telecom firms though Hartman has complained to the court docket about this the monitoring and surveillance proceed . The seize and the change of her content material continues . The DOD , Division of Protection or DARPA who gave rise to the Arpanet , the unique web , Nationwide Science Basis and others listed in her criticism seem to have entry to her filings. She is discovering earlier data that she had researched modified . Her motions are by no means entered of their entirety . She plans on in search of an Attraction based mostly on error – on this case the excluding of proof from the docket and violations by the court docket in sustaining appropriate data .
Particularly since this set of trials started within the Court docket of Federal Claims that’s supposed to guard the constitutional rights of the nation’s residents ( Ms. Hartman is an African- American who’s claiming a fantastic invention that mysteriously after 1990 ended up as being owned by the federal authorities) so it’s a good assumption that politics are at play right here . Moreover Telecommunications has produced extra wealth income than the gold or oil growth . One of many main markings of politics in the USA is institutionalized racism and the Biden and no different administration has but been in a position to change that . To the best is an illustration displaying that the Division of Commerce is clear proprietor and centralized headquarters now for the Telecommunications Trade . How and why does the federal government have full possession over this when Hartman claims that that is her mental property taken from her and to date no truthful court docket trial or listening to on it wherever .Ms. Hartman claims unique designs from Benefit Networks are much like hers and are amongst these displays being saved from the general public by the ERROR susceptible docket within the Nationwide Court docket of Federal Claims . How is that this one of many world’s biggest invention making its debut within the 1990’s in some way landed within the possession by the USA with no mental property safety . No patenting, however declared a Utility by Obama in 2016 and headquartered within the U.S. Division of Commerce .
To entry this court docket continuing , you will need to go to Pacer.gov , choose Court docket of Federal Claims ( Nationwide Court docket ) , enter Case no. 21-2214 Hartman vs. United States .
Hartman alleges that your entire web of at the moment and that has been in existence since 1990 is predicated on the federal government’s confiscation of her private mental property entitled the Accessing Accessibility Course of – claiming it as their very own which is a violation of its personal battle of curiosity legal guidelines and its continued victimization of Ms. Hartman by means of the unlawful trials being carried on now that lack Due Means of Regulation . This doesn’t bode nicely for the nation as a result of it’s a mountain of corruption that was set as much as not solely empower however enrich authorities staff . Many on each side of the aisle Democrats and Republicans have and proceed to learn from insider inventory market buying and selling . Additional the inventor alleges that from the very begin the mental property that ought to have been patented however was not was not protected and was exported freely to nations that participated within the NaFTa Commerce Agreements – making those that participated in it wealthy . The Media together with social media and media retailers say nothing about it – as a result of they’re additionally getting a royalty free trip from the Federal Authorities which declared the Web a Utility with out paying Eminent Area to the African-American girl who’s its true inventor . Nevertheless the run away inflation is tied to those unlawful acts that cowl a number of trials all secret. The smaller web companies , webhosts sabotage her movies , web sites , and start-ups .
Founder/CEO
Abfysellers Group Founder
email us here
https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/576106702/internet-inventor-alleges-that-information-that-she-shares-in-court-is-shared-with-the-industry
